Papers › Aortic Valve Disease Screening from PPG via Physiology-Guided Self-Supervised Learning

Aortic Valve Disease Screening from PPG via Physiology-Guided Self-Supervised Learning

4 Feb 2026arXiv:2602.04266added by Syntology

Jiaze Wang, Qinghao Zhao, Zizheng Chen, Zhejun Sun, Deyun Zhang, Yuxi Zhou, Shenda Hong

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Aortic valve disease (AVD) represents a major public health burden, while its diagnosis relies on echocardiography, which is limited by cost and specialist expertise, restricting scalable screening and risk stratification. Existing portable sensing modalities are constrained by indirect representations or acquisition dependencies. In this context, photoplethysmography (PPG), a widely available optical signal capturing peripheral hemodynamic dynamics, provides a scalable physiological measurement. However, the scarcity of clinically labeled PPG data severely constrains the development of effective data-driven models. To address this limitation, we propose Physiology-Guided Self-Supervised Learning (PG-SSL), leveraging approximately 170,000 unlabeled UK Biobank PPG recordings. PG-SSL constructs physiologically derived pseudo-labels based on clinically motivated waveform phenotypes associated with aortic stenosis (AS) and aortic regurgitation (AR), enabling large-scale pretraining without AVD-specific labels. Following fine-tuning on a small labeled cohort, the model achieved AUROCs of 0.8025 for AS and 0.7669 for AR. Further analyses demonstrated robustness under clinical confounding and covariate-balanced evaluation, as well as significant longitudinal associations with incident AVD events. This study demonstrates the feasibility of PG-SSL for leveraging large-scale unlabeled physiological signals under clinically labeled data-scarce conditions. The proposed approach provides a useful strategy for improving low-cost PPG-based screening and risk enrichment for clinically recognized AVD.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 6 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from PKUDigitalHealth/PiLA-PPG. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2602.04266, was issued in February 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections