Papers › FiLoRA: Focus-and-Ignore LoRA for Controllable Feature Reliance

FiLoRA: Focus-and-Ignore LoRA for Controllable Feature Reliance

2 Feb 2026arXiv:2602.02060added by Syntology

Hyunsuk Chung, Soyeon Caren Han, Seungyeon Ji, Jinwoo Kim, Eun-Jung Holden, Kyungreem Han

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Multimodal foundation models integrate heterogeneous signals across modalities, yet it remains unclear whether their predictions can be controlled by explicitly modulating reliance on different internal feature pathways. Existing approaches to shortcut and spurious behavior primarily rely on post hoc analysis or data-level interventions, offering limited ability to directly intervene on how models use information. We introduce FiLoRA (Focus-and-Ignore LoRA), an instruction-conditioned, parameter-efficient adaptation framework that enables controllable modulation of feature reliance while keeping the task and predictive objective fixed. FiLoRA decomposes adaptation into feature-aligned low-rank modules and applies instruction-conditioned gating, allowing natural language instructions to act as computation-level control signals over internal representations. We evaluate FiLoRA across both controlled classification settings and generative multimodal tasks, and under a range of instruction types, including natural and compositional instructions. Results show that FiLoRA induces consistent and interpretable shifts in feature reliance, selectively amplifying or suppressing different feature groups in accordance with the instruction, without altering task semantics. Our findings suggest that instruction-conditioned parameter adaptation can serve as a practical mechanism for intervening on internal model behavior, providing a new perspective on controllability and analysis of multimodal systems beyond output-level prompting or post hoc interpretation.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

11 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 9 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from AndreyGuzhov/AudioCLIP. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2602.02060, was issued in February 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections