Papers › PolarMem: A Training-Free Polarized Latent Graph Memory for Verifiable Vision-Language Models
PolarMem: A Training-Free Polarized Latent Graph Memory for Verifiable Vision-Language Models
Zhisheng Chen, Tingyu Wu, Zijie Zhou, Zhengwei Xie, Jinhan Li, Ziyan Weng, Liang Lin, Jingwei Song, Zikai Xiao, Yingwei Zhang
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Memory is not merely a storage mechanism for intelligent systems, but a structure for organizing evidence and constraining belief. This is especially important for multimodal reasoning, where retrieved evidence must be both query-relevant and visually consistent. However, current memory systems for vision-language models (VLMs) remain largely positive-associative: they retrieve what is similar or previously observed, but lack an explicit way to remember what has been verified as absent or logically excluded. To this end, we propose \textbf{PolarMem}, a training-free polarized latent graph memory framework for verifiable vision-language reasoning. PolarMem transforms frozen VLM perceptual signals into \textit{HAS}, \textit{NOT\_HAS}, and \textit{Uncertain} memory states through semantic consistency verification and adaptive distributional partitioning, and stores them in a polarized graph with distinct positive and negative memory relations. During inference, a lexicographical logic-aware retrieval protocol enforces logical consistency before semantic similarity, suppressing conflicting memories before they enter the model context. Across eight frozen VLM backbones and six multimodal benchmarks, PolarMem consistently improves retrieval-intensive tasks and reduces retrieval-level contradictions. These results highlight negative memory as a key mechanism for building more reliable multimodal memory systems. Our code is available at https://github.com/czs-ict/PolarMem.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2602.00415")
Code
Syntology Ran 1 of 1 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
1 sample harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 1 of the 1 sample is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from czs-ict/PolarMem. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
36dad629e7ae4d61 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2602.00415, was issued in February 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections