Papers › Comparative evaluation of training strategies using partially labelled datasets for...
Comparative evaluation of training strategies using partially labelled datasets for segmentation of white matter hyperintensities and stroke lesions in FLAIR MRI
Jesse Phitidis, Alison Q. Smithard, William N. Whiteley, Joanna M. Wardlaw, Miguel O. Bernabeu, Maria Valdés Hernández
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
White matter hyperintensities (WMH) and ischaemic stroke lesions (ISL) are key imaging biomarkers of cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) detectable on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The development of robust deep learning models to automatically segment and differentiate these pathologies remains challenging. Specifically, WMH and ISL frequently co-occur within the same subject and present as visually confounding hyperintensities on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences, complicating their accurate delineation. To address the scarcity of fully annotated cohorts, we systematically evaluated six accessible strategies for training a joint WMH and ISL segmentation model using partially labelled data. We aggregated privately held and publicly available datasets to curate a large-scale cohort of 2,052 MRI volumes, of which 1341 and 1152 volumes contained ground truth annotations for WMH and ISL, respectively. Our analysis indicates that multiple strategies effectively leverage partially labelled data to enhance overall model performance, with pseudolabelling emerging as the most effective approach. This model exhibited a consistent WMH segmentation policy and successfully detected the majority of FLAIR-positive ISL. These findings demonstrate the viability of using partially labelled data to develop reliable automated segmentation tools, which can support ongoing SVD monitoring and high-throughput biomarker extraction for large-scale clinical research.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Syntology holds the repository link but has not harvested or run code from it.
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2601.20503, was issued in January 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections