Papers › AJAR: Adaptive Jailbreak Architecture for Red-teaming

AJAR: Adaptive Jailbreak Architecture for Red-teaming

16 Jan 2026arXiv:2601.10971added by Syntology

Yipu Dou, Wang Yang

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Large language model (LLM) safety evaluation is moving from content moderation to action security as modern systems gain persistent state, tool access, and autonomous control loops. Existing jailbreak frameworks still leave a gap between adaptive multi-turn attacks and agentic runtimes: attack algorithms are usually packaged as monolithic scripts, while agent harnesses rarely expose explicit abstractions for rollback, tool simulation, or strategy switching. We present AJAR, a red-teaming framework that exposes multi-turn jailbreak algorithms as callable MCP services and lets an Auditor Agent orchestrate them inside a tool-aware runtime built on Petri. AJAR integrates three representative attacks, namely Crescendo, ActorAttack, and X-Teaming, under a shared service interface for planning, prompt generation, optimization, evaluation, and context control. On 200 HarmBench validation behaviors, AJAR improves X-Teaming from 65.0% to 76.0% attack success rate (ASR), reaches 80% cumulative success one turn earlier than the native implementation, and reproduces Crescendo more effectively than PyRIT (91.0% vs. 87.5% ASR). Behavior-level analysis shows that these gains are concentrated in hard categories and frequently depend on rollback-enabled transcript repair. We further show that tool access reshapes rather than uniformly enlarges the attack surface: ActorAttack rises from 51.0% to 56.0% ASR with tools, whereas Crescendo drops from 91.0% to 78.0% and X-Teaming from 76.0% to 55.5%, with the sharpest declines appearing in categories that rely on long semantic buildup. These results position AJAR as a practical foundation for evaluating multi-turn jailbreaks under realistic agent constraints. Code and data are available at https://github.com/douyipu/ajar.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 4 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from douyipu/ajar. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2601.10971, was issued in January 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections