Papers › Hot-Start Chinese Language Modeling:Visual Glyphs Accelerate Sample-Efficient Learning
Hot-Start Chinese Language Modeling:Visual Glyphs Accelerate Sample-Efficient Learning
Shuyang Xiang, Hao Guan
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
In this work, we study whether rendering Chinese characters as visual glyph images, rather than discrete token IDs as mainstream LLMs do, providing an inductive bias for character-level language modeling. Our central finding gives a double-edged insight: visual inputs produce a pronounced hot-start effect, more than doubling early-stage accuracy within the first epoch (at 0.4% of total training steps) (12.3% visual inputs vs. 5.8% index-based baseline), yet both approaches converge to essentially identical final accuracy (39%). This pattern holds across resolutions as low as 8x8 pixels, partial cropping up to 50%, and model scales from 110M to 1.78B parameters. The mechanism we identify is that glyph rendering pre-encodes radical-based structure into embedding space before any training (cosine similarity 0.27 vs. 0.002 for random embeddings), enabling faster alignment but not higher final capacity. Our results clarify both the promise and fundamental limitation of visual representations as inductive biases for Chinese language modeling.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Syntology holds the repository link but has not harvested or run code from it.
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2601.09566, was issued in January 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections