Papers › Evaluating Generalization Capabilities of LLM-Based Agents in Mixed-Motive Scenarios...

Evaluating Generalization Capabilities of LLM-Based Agents in Mixed-Motive Scenarios Using Concordia

3 Dec 2025NeurIPSarXiv:2512.03318added by Syntology

Chandler Smith, Marwa Abdulhai, Manfred Diaz, Marko Tesic, Rakshit S. Trivedi, Alexander Sasha Vezhnevets, Lewis Hammond, Jesse Clifton, Minsuk Chang, Edgar A. Duéñez-Guzmán, John P. Agapiou, Jayd Matyas, Danny Karmon, Akash Kundu, Aliaksei Korshuk, Ananya Ananya, Arrasy Rahman, Avinaash Anand Kulandaivel, Bain McHale, Beining Zhang, Buyantuev Alexander, Carlos Saith Rodriguez Rojas, Caroline Wang, Chetan Talele, Chenao Liu, Chichen Lin, Diana Riazi, Di Yang Shi, Emanuel Tewolde, Elizaveta Tennant, Fangwei Zhong, Fuyang Cui, Gang Zhao, Gema Parreño Piqueras, Hyeonggeun Yun, Ilya Makarov, Jiaxun Cui, Jebish Purbey, Jim Dilkes, Jord Nguyen, Lingyun Xiao, Luis Felipe Giraldo, Manuela Chacon-Chamorro, Manuel Sebastian Rios Beltran, Marta Emili García Segura, Mengmeng Wang, Mogtaba Alim, Nicanor Quijano, Nico Schiavone, Olivia Macmillan-Scott, Oswaldo Peña, Peter Stone, Ram Mohan Rao Kadiyala, Rolando Fernandez, Ruben Manrique, Sunjia Lu, Sheila A. McIlraith, Shamika Dhuri, Shuqing Shi, Siddhant Gupta, Sneheel Sarangi, Sriram Ganapathi Subramanian, Taehun Cha, Toryn Q. Klassen, Wenming Tu, Weijian Fan, Wu Ruiyang, Xue Feng, Yali Du, Yang Liu, Yiding Wang, Yipeng Kang, Yoonchang Sung, Yuxuan Chen, Zhaowei Zhang, Zhihan Wang, Zhiqiang Wu, Ziang Chen, Zilong Zheng, Zixia Jia, Ziyan Wang, Dylan Hadfield-Menell, Natasha Jaques, Tim Baarslag, Jose Hernandez-Orallo, Joel Z. Leibo

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Large Language Model (LLM) agents have demonstrated impressive capabilities for social interaction and are increasingly being deployed in situations where they might engage with both human and artificial agents. These interactions represent a critical frontier for LLM-based agents, yet existing evaluation methods fail to measure how well these capabilities generalize to novel social situations. In this paper, we introduce a method for evaluating the ability of LLM-based agents to cooperate in zero-shot, mixed-motive environments using Concordia, a natural language multi-agent simulation environment. Our method measures general cooperative intelligence by testing an agent's ability to identify and exploit opportunities for mutual gain across diverse partners and contexts. We present empirical results from the NeurIPS 2024 Concordia Contest, where agents were evaluated on their ability to achieve mutual gains across a suite of diverse scenarios ranging from negotiation to collective action problems. Our findings reveal significant gaps between current agent capabilities and the robust generalization required for reliable cooperation, particularly in scenarios demanding persuasion and norm enforcement.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from google-deepmind/concordia. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2512.03318, was issued in December 2025, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections