Papers › Omni-View: Unlocking How Generation Facilitates Understanding in Unified 3D Model...
Omni-View: Unlocking How Generation Facilitates Understanding in Unified 3D Model based on Multiview images
JiaKui Hu, Shanshan Zhao, Qing-Guo Chen, Xuerui Qiu, Jialun Liu, Zhao Xu, Weihua Luo, Kaifu Zhang, Yanye Lu
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
This paper presents Omni-View, which extends the unified multimodal understanding and generation to 3D scenes based on multiview images, exploring the principle that "generation facilitates understanding". Consisting of understanding model, texture module, and geometry module, Omni-View jointly models scene understanding, novel view synthesis, and geometry estimation, enabling synergistic interaction between 3D scene understanding and generation tasks. By design, it leverages the spatiotemporal modeling capabilities of its texture module responsible for appearance synthesis, alongside the explicit geometric constraints provided by its dedicated geometry module, thereby enriching the model's holistic understanding of 3D scenes. Trained with a two-stage strategy, Omni-View achieves a state-of-the-art score of 55.4 on the VSI-Bench benchmark, outperforming existing specialized 3D understanding models, while simultaneously delivering strong performance in both novel view synthesis and 3D scene generation. The code and pretraiend models are open-sourced at https://github.com/AIDC-AI/Omni-View.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2511.07222")
Code
Syntology Ran 15 of 20 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 3 ran · fixture could not drive it; 8 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 20 samples from 1 repository, 15 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
20 samples harvested; 15 ran; 3 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 20 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from AIDC-AI/Omni-View. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
f6284cebe0874960 · report
6b57c96f496ffe7a · report
9e7503f9df29310e · report
fc6e2b056af68059 · report
9f9bd13772afc5eb · report
6210361c8db8ce59 · report
50e1b7ee98771981 · report
55c8aaa067258da8 · report
d6770087d9175340 · report
b881c649136fa014 · report
30fbd09c866603a5 · report
d70c9597917251cf · report
1fb1e538cd18f82e · report
ed311bf19f15387b · report
06c91d3233a2f559 · report
8e50c985e5867e62 · report
6d6b2d7e400c5f4b · report
e093c7840714cbc5 · report
9eb3371165400f36 · report
eb2e7b553e18165a · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2511.07222, was issued in November 2025, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections