Papers › Are Large Language Models Effective Knowledge Graph Constructors?
Are Large Language Models Effective Knowledge Graph Constructors?
Ruirui Chen, Weifeng Jiang, Chengwei Qin, Bo Xiong, Kaiwen Wei, Fiona Liausvia, Pei Fang Tan, Ker Yung Chua, Dongkyu Choi, Mukkesh Kumar, Evelyn C. Law, Dennis Wang, Boon Kiat Quek
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Knowledge graphs (KGs) are widely used in knowledge-intensive applications, yet it remains unclear how effectively current large language models (LLMs) can construct document-grounded KGs in a zero-shot, schema-free setting without relying on complex task-specific frameworks. We introduce Detail-to-Abstract Hierarchical Knowledge Graph (D2A-HKG) construction framework, which decomposes KG construction into three stages: initial extraction, splitting, and abstraction, and evaluates the resulting graphs from both semantic and structural perspectives. Using seven frontier LLMs, we benchmark zero-shot KG construction on CMW-Lit, a dataset derived from published paediatric research articles on children's mental well-being. CMW-Lit provides a challenging test bed due to its heterogeneous evidence, interconnected factors, and complex, statistically qualified relationships. Our results show that state-of-the-art LLMs can generally produce relevant and document-faithful triples with limited hallucination, while exhibiting substantially different extraction behaviors across the construction stages. These findings provide empirical insight into the strengths and limitations of frontier LLMs for direct knowledge graph construction. We further release CMW-Lit and the resulting knowledge graphs as resources for future research, with the generated graphs providing a strong foundation for expert refinement and downstream knowledge-intensive applications.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Syntology holds the repository link but has not harvested or run code from it.
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2510.11297, was issued in October 2025, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections