Papers › Tight Robustness Certificates and Wasserstein Distributional Attacks for Deep Neural Networks
Tight Robustness Certificates and Wasserstein Distributional Attacks for Deep Neural Networks
Bach C. Le, Tung V. Dao, Binh T. Nguyen, Hong T. M. Chu
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization (WDRO) provides a framework for adversarial robustness, yet existing methods based on global Lipschitz continuity or strong duality often yield loose upper bounds or require prohibitive computation. We address these limitations with a primal approach and adopt a notion of exact Lipschitz certificates to tighten this upper bound of WDRO. For ReLU networks, we leverage the piecewise-affine structure on activation cells to obtain an exact tractable characterization of the corresponding WDRO problem. We further extend our analysis to modern architectures with smooth activations (e.g., GELU, SiLU), such as Transformers. Additionally, we propose novel Wasserstein Distributional Attacks (WDA, WDA++) that construct candidates for the worst-case distribution. Compared to existing attacks that are restricted to point-wise perturbations, our methods offer greater flexibility in the number and location of attack points. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that our proposed framework achieves competitive robust accuracy against state-of-the-art baselines while offering tighter certificates than existing methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/OLab-Repo/WDA.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2510.10000")
Code
Syntology Ran 9 of 10 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 7 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 10 samples from 1 repository, 9 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
10 samples harvested; 9 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 10 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from OLab-Repo/WDA. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
2a561aa548bc6fb4 · report
807a584b3f1fcb9d · report
b5f4da08ed2f8454 · report
9f4d30e596077b4e · report
32867cca8497e161 · report
b55c7c30af1455bf · report
c09cbca10020bb47 · report
03470b33e72d35ab · report
0ecdb586df3512b0 · report
ad15e93be187df03 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2510.10000, was issued in October 2025, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections