Papers › FlowMoE: A Scalable Pipeline Scheduling Framework for Distributed Mixture-of-Experts Training

FlowMoE: A Scalable Pipeline Scheduling Framework for Distributed Mixture-of-Experts Training

30 Sep 2025NeurIPSarXiv:2510.00207added by Syntology

Yunqi Gao, Bing Hu, Mahdi Boloursaz Mashhadi, A-Long Jin, Yanfeng Zhang, Pei Xiao, Rahim Tafazolli, Merouane Debbah

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

The parameter size of modern large language models (LLMs) can be scaled up via the sparsely-activated Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) technique to avoid excessive increase of the computational costs. To further improve training efficiency, pipelining computation and communication has become a promising solution for distributed MoE training. However, existing work primarily focuses on scheduling tasks within the MoE layer, such as expert computing and all-to-all (A2A) communication, while neglecting other key operations including multi-head attention (MHA) computing, gating, and all-reduce communication. In this paper, we propose FlowMoE, a scalable framework for scheduling multi-type task pipelines. First, FlowMoE constructs a unified pipeline to consistently scheduling MHA computing, gating, expert computing, and A2A communication. Second, FlowMoE introduces a tensor chunk-based priority scheduling mechanism to overlap the all-reduce communication with all computing tasks. We implement FlowMoE as an adaptive and generic framework atop PyTorch. Extensive experiments with 675 typical MoE layers and four real-world MoE models across two GPU clusters demonstrate that our proposed FlowMoE framework outperforms state-of-the-art MoE training frameworks, reducing training time by 13%-57%, energy consumption by 10%-39%, and memory usage by 7%-32%.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

9 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 9 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 9 of the 9 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from ZJU-CNLAB/FlowMoE. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2510.00207, was issued in October 2025, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections