Papers › SeedPrints: Fingerprints Can Even Tell Which Seed Your Large Language Model Was Trained From

SeedPrints: Fingerprints Can Even Tell Which Seed Your Large Language Model Was Trained From

30 Sep 2025ICLRarXiv:2509.26404added by Syntology

Yao Tong, Haonan Wang, Siquan Li, Kenji Kawaguchi, Tianyang Hu

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Fingerprinting Large Language Models (LLMs)is essential for provenance verification and model attribution. Existing fingerprinting methods are primarily evaluated after fine-tuning, where models have already acquired stable signatures from training data, optimization dynamics, or hyperparameters. However, most of a model's capacity and knowledge are acquired during pretraining rather than downstream fine-tuning, making large-scale pretraining a more fundamental regime for lineage verification. We show that existing fingerprinting methods become unreliable in this regime, as they rely on post-hoc signatures that only emerge after substantial training. This limitation contradicts the classical Galton notion of a fingerprint as an intrinsic and persistent identity. In contrast, we propose a stronger and more intrinsic notion of LLM fingerprinting: SeedPrints, a method that leverages random initialization biases as persistent, seed-dependent identifiers present even before training begins. We show that untrained models exhibit reproducible prediction biases induced by their initialization seed, and that these weak signals remain statistically detectable throughout training, enabling high-confidence lineage verification. Unlike prior techniques that fail during early pretraining or degrade under distribution shifts, SeedPrints remains effective across all training stages, from initialization to large-scale pretraining and downstream adaptation. Experiments on LLaMA-style and Qwen-style models demonstrate seed-level distinguishability and enable birth-to-lifecycle identity verification. Evaluations on large-scale pretraining trajectories and real-world fingerprinting benchmarks further confirm its robustness under prolonged training, domain shifts, and parameter modifications.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

10 samples harvested; 10 ran; 2 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 10 of the 10 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from YnezT0311/SeedPrints. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2509.26404, was issued in September 2025, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections