Papers › BeyondBench: Contamination-Resistant Evaluation of Reasoning in Language Models
BeyondBench: Contamination-Resistant Evaluation of Reasoning in Language Models
Gaurav Srivastava, Aafiya Hussain, Zhenyu Bi, Swastik Roy, Priya Pitre, Meng Lu, Morteza Ziyadi, Xuan Wang
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Evaluating language models fairly is increasingly difficult as static benchmarks risk contamination by training data, obscuring whether models truly reason or recall. We introduce BeyondBench, an evaluation framework using algorithmic problem generation to create mathematically grounded problems on the fly, ensuring each test remains uncontaminated. Our framework covers 44 algorithmic tasks with 117 variations across three difficulty levels: the Easy Suite (29 tasks) for arithmetic and statistics, the Medium Suite (5 tasks, 49 variations) for sequence patterns and reasoning, and the Hard Suite (10 tasks, 68 variations) for NP-complete and constraint satisfaction problems. Each task draws from a space exceeding 10^15 unique instances, with deterministically verified solutions. We evaluated 101 language models (85 open-source, 16 closed-source), spanning 0.5B to 141B parameters and multiple quantization schemes, using three-fold evaluation for robustness. Results reveal consistent reasoning deficiencies, with performance degrading sharply as complexity increases. In Hard Suite evaluations, Gemini-2.5-pro, Llama-3.3-70B, and Qwen2.5-72B achieved accuracies of 56.21%, 27.16%, and 33.37% respectively. Performance drops significantly without tool usage, with GPT-5, GPT-5-mini, and GPT-5-nano showing declines of 16.81%, 15.86%, and 43.95% in overall accuracy. Contamination resistance rests on three guarantees: (i) the problem space vastly exceeds any static dataset, (ii) every instance has a deterministically verifiable solution, and (iii) isomorphic transformations yield semantically equivalent but syntactically novel problems. BeyondBench redefines reasoning evaluation via genuine algorithmic problem-solving. Our leaderboard is at https://ctrl-gaurav.github.io/BeyondBench/, Python package at https://pypi.org/project/beyondbench/, and codebase at https://github.com/ctrl-gaurav/BeyondBench.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2509.24210")
Code
Syntology Ran 0 of 8 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 8 have no recorded run.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 8 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
8 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 8 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from ctrl-gaurav/BeyondBench. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
a7c24f807e1e3fc4 · report
4ed5d52e7e43c0b6 · report
a02e1bfc6cb1e203 · report
a8f5cfa721eed1a4 · report
bf184a3db27e565c · report
0e1f0d851874adda · report
cf9029da638b8731 · report
076a11c7b5234a48 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2509.24210, was issued in September 2025, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections