Papers › Overclocking Electrostatic Generative Models
Overclocking Electrostatic Generative Models
Daniil Shlenskii, Alexander Korotin
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Electrostatic generative models such as PFGM++ have recently emerged as a powerful framework, achieving competitive performance in image synthesis. PFGM++ operates in an extended data space with auxiliary dimensionality D, recovering the diffusion model framework as D→∞, while yielding superior empirical results for finite D. Like diffusion models, PFGM++ relies on expensive ODE simulations to generate samples, making it computationally costly. To address this, we propose Inverse Poisson Flow Matching (IPFM), a principled distillation framework that accelerates electrostatic generative models across all values of D. Our IPFM reformulates distillation as an inverse problem: learning a generator whose induced electrostatic field matches that of the teacher. We derive a tractable training objective for this problem and show that, as D→∞, our IPFM closely recovers Score Identity Distillation (SiD), a recent method for distilling diffusion models. Empirically, our IPFM produces distilled generators that achieve near-teacher or even superior sample quality using only a few function evaluations. Moreover, we find that one-step generator distillation converges faster at finite D than in the D→∞ diffusion limit, aligning with prior evidence that finite-D PFGM++ models offer more favorable optimization and sampling behavior.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Syntology holds the repository link but has not harvested or run code from it.
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2509.22454, was issued in September 2025, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections