Papers › Antipodal Robotic Grasping using Generative Residual Convolutional Neural Network

Antipodal Robotic Grasping using Generative Residual Convolutional Neural Network

11 Sep 2019arXiv:1909.04810archive 2025-07-28

Sulabh Kumra, Shirin Joshi, Ferat Sahin

In this paper, we present a modular robotic system to tackle the problem of generating and performing antipodal robotic grasps for unknown objects from n-channel image of the scene. We propose a novel Generative Residual Convolutional Neural Network (GR-ConvNet) model that can generate robust antipodal grasps from n-channel input at real-time speeds (~20ms). We evaluate the proposed model architecture on standard datasets and a diverse set of household objects. We achieved state-of-the-art accuracy of 97.7% and 94.6% on Cornell and Jacquard grasping datasets respectively. We also demonstrate a grasp success rate of 95.4% and 93% on household and adversarial objects respectively using a 7 DoF robotic arm.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

skumra/baxter-pnp officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report
skumra/robotic-grasping officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report
SteveHao74/shahao_GR-ConvNet mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
qingchenkanlu/new_grasp mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Robotic Grasping

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Robotic Grasping Cornell Grasp Dataset GR-ConvNet 5 fold cross validation 97.7 #2 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Robotic Grasping Jacquard dataset GR-ConvNet Accuracy (%) 94.6 #2 of 3 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections