Papers › Anti-phase synchronization in a population of swarmalators
Anti-phase synchronization in a population of swarmalators
Samali Ghosh, Gourab Kumar Sar, Soumen Majhi, Dibakar Ghosh
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Swarmalators are oscillatory systems endowed with a spatial component, whose spatial and phase dynamics affect each other. Such systems can demonstrate fascinating collective dynamics resembling many real-world processes. Through this work, we study a population of swarmalators where they are divided into different communities. The strengths of spatial attraction, repulsion as well as phase interaction differ from one group to another. Also, they vary from inter-community to intra-community. We encounter, as a result of variation in the phase coupling strength, different routes to achieve the static synchronization state by choosing several parameter combinations. We observe that when the inter-community phase coupling strength is sufficiently large, swarmalators settle in the static synchronization state. On the other hand, with a significant small phase coupling strength the state of anti-phase synchronization as well as chimera-like coexistence of sync and async are realized. Apart from rigorous numerical results, we have been successful to provide semi-analytical treatment for the existence and stability of global static sync and the anti-phase sync states.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections