Papers › Analyzing billion-objects catalog interactively: Apache Spark for physicists
Analyzing billion-objects catalog interactively: Apache Spark for physicists
S. Plaszczynski, J. Peloton, C. Arnault, J. E. Campagne
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Apache Spark is a Big Data framework for working on large distributed datasets. Although widely used in the industry, it remains rather limited in the academic community or often restricted to software engineers. The goal of this paper is to show with practical uses-cases that the technology is mature enough to be used without excessive programming skills by astronomers or cosmologists in order to perform standard analyses over large datasets, as those originating from future galaxy surveys. To demonstrate it, we start from a realistic simulation corresponding to 10 years of LSST data taking (6 billions of galaxies). Then, we design, optimize and benchmark a set of Spark python algorithms in order to perform standard operations as adding photometric redshift errors, measuring the selection function or computing power spectra over tomographic bins. Most of the commands execute on the full 110 GB dataset within tens of seconds and can therefore be performed interactively in order to design full-scale cosmological analyses. A jupyter notebook summarizing the analysis is available at https://github.com/astrolabsoftware/1807.03078.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections