Papers › Analysis, Design, and Generalization of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)...

Analysis, Design, and Generalization of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) Inversion Algorithms

12 Jun 2020arXiv:2006.07363links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Surya Effendy, Juhyun Song, Martin Z. Bazant

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

We introduce a framework for analyzing and designing EIS inversion algorithms. Our framework stems from the observation of four features common to well-defined EIS inversion algorithms, namely (1) the representation of unknown distributions, (2) the minimization of a metric of error to estimate parameters arising from the chosen representation, subject to constraints on (3) the complexity control parameters, and (4) a means for choosing optimal control parameter values. These features must be present to overcome the ill-posed nature of EIS inversion problems. We review three established EIS inversion algorithms to illustrate the pervasiveness of these features, and show the utility of the framework by resolving ambiguities concerning three more algorithms. Our framework is then used to design the generalized EIS inversion (gEISi) algorithm, which uses Gaussian basis function representation, modality control parameter, and cross-validation for choosing the optimal control parameter value. The gEISi algorithm is applicable to the generalized EIS inversion problem, which allows for a wider range of underlying models. We also considered the construction of credible intervals for distributions arising from the algorithm. The algorithm is able to accurately reproduce distributions which have been difficult to obtain using existing algorithms. It is provided gratis on the repository https://github.com/suryaeff/gEISi.git.

PaperPDFCode

Code

suryaeff/gEISi officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections