Papers › Analysis and predictability of centrality measures in competition networks
Analysis and predictability of centrality measures in competition networks
Anthony Bonato, Mariam Walaa
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
The Common Out-Neighbor (or CON) score quantifies shared influence through outgoing links in competitive contexts. A dynamic analysis of competition networks reveals the CON score as a powerful predictor of node rankings. Defined in first-order and second-order forms, the CON score captures both direct and indirect competitive interactions, offering a comprehensive metric for evaluating node influence. Using datasets from Survivor, Chess.com, and Dota~2 online gaming competitions, directed competition networks are constructed, and the dynamic CON score is integrated into supervised machine learning models. Empirical results show that the CON score consistently outperforms traditional centrality measures such as PageRank, closeness, and betweenness centrality in classification tasks. By integrating dynamic centrality measures with machine learning, our proposed methodology accurately predicts outcomes in competition networks. The findings underline the CON score's robustness as a feature in node classification, offering a significant advancement in understanding and analyzing competitive interactions.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections