Papers › An Unsupervised Sentence Embedding Method by Mutual Information Maximization
An Unsupervised Sentence Embedding Method by Mutual Information Maximization
Yan Zhang, Ruidan He, Zuozhu Liu, Kwan Hui Lim, Lidong Bing
BERT is inefficient for sentence-pair tasks such as clustering or semantic search as it needs to evaluate combinatorially many sentence pairs which is very time-consuming. Sentence BERT (SBERT) attempted to solve this challenge by learning semantically meaningful representations of single sentences, such that similarity comparison can be easily accessed. However, SBERT is trained on corpus with high-quality labeled sentence pairs, which limits its application to tasks where labeled data is extremely scarce. In this paper, we propose a lightweight extension on top of BERT and a novel self-supervised learning objective based on mutual information maximization strategies to derive meaningful sentence embeddings in an unsupervised manner. Unlike SBERT, our method is not restricted by the availability of labeled data, such that it can be applied on different domain-specific corpus. Experimental results show that the proposed method significantly outperforms other unsupervised sentence embedding baselines on common semantic textual similarity (STS) tasks and downstream supervised tasks. It also outperforms SBERT in a setting where in-domain labeled data is not available, and achieves performance competitive with supervised methods on various tasks.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semantic Textual Similarity | SICK | IS-BERT-NLI | Spearman Correlation | 0.6425 | #22 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Textual Similarity | STS Benchmark | IS-BERT-NLI | Spearman Correlation | 0.6921 | #61 of 66 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Textual Similarity | STS12 | IS-BERT-NLI | Spearman Correlation | 0.5677 | #20 of 20 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Textual Similarity | STS13 | IS-BERT-NLI | Spearman Correlation | 0.6924 | #22 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Textual Similarity | STS14 | IS-BERT-NLI | Spearman Correlation | 0.6121 | #21 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Textual Similarity | STS15 | IS-BERT-NLI | Spearman Correlation | 0.7523 | #19 of 20 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Textual Similarity | STS16 | IS-BERT-NLI | Spearman Correlation | 0.7016 | #20 of 20 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections