Papers › An Orientation Bias in Observations of Submillimetre Galaxies
An Orientation Bias in Observations of Submillimetre Galaxies
C. C. Lovell, J. E. Geach, R. Davé, D. Narayanan, K. E. K. Coppin, Q. Li, M. Franco, G. C. Privon
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Recent high-resolution interferometric images of submillimetre galaxies (SMGs) reveal fascinatingly complex morphologies. This raises a number of questions: how does the relative orientation of a galaxy affect its observed submillimetre emission, and does this result in an `orientation bias' in the selection and analysis of such galaxies in flux-limited cosmological surveys? We investigated these questions using the \textsc{Simba} cosmological simulation paired with the dust radiative transfer code \textsc{Powderday}. We selected eight simulated SMGs (S₈₅₀≳2 mJy) at z = 2, and measured the variance of their `observed' emission over 50 random orientations. Each galaxy exhibits significant scatter in its emission close to the peak of the thermal dust emission, with variation in flux density of up to a factor of 2.7. This results in an appreciable dispersion in the inferred dust temperatures and infrared luminosities (16ᵗʰ-84ᵗʰ percentile ranges of 5\,K and 0.1\,dex, respectively) and therefore a fundamental uncertainty in derived parameters such as dust mass and star formation rate (∼30% for the latter using simple calibrations). Using a Monte Carlo simulation we also assessed the impact of orientation on flux-limited surveys, finding a bias in the selection of SMGs towards those with face--on orientations, as well as those at lower redshifts. We predict that the orientation bias will affect flux-limited single-dish surveys, most significantly at THz frequencies, and this bias should be taken into account when placing the results of targeted follow--up studies in a statistical context.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections