Papers › An optical neural network using less than 1 photon per multiplication

An optical neural network using less than 1 photon per multiplication

27 Apr 2021arXiv:2104.13467archive 2025-07-28

Tianyu Wang, Shi-Yuan Ma, Logan G. Wright, Tatsuhiro Onodera, Brian Richard, Peter L. McMahon

Deep learning has rapidly become a widespread tool in both scientific and commercial endeavors. Milestones of deep learning exceeding human performance have been achieved for a growing number of tasks over the past several years, across areas as diverse as game-playing, natural-language translation, and medical-image analysis. However, continued progress is increasingly hampered by the high energy costs associated with training and running deep neural networks on electronic processors. Optical neural networks have attracted attention as an alternative physical platform for deep learning, as it has been theoretically predicted that they can fundamentally achieve higher energy efficiency than neural networks deployed on conventional digital computers. Here, we experimentally demonstrate an optical neural network achieving 99% accuracy on handwritten-digit classification using ~3.2 detected photons per weight multiplication and ~90% accuracy using ~0.64 photons (~2.4 ×10⁻¹⁹ J of optical energy) per weight multiplication. This performance was achieved using a custom free-space optical processor that executes matrix-vector multiplications in a massively parallel fashion, with up to ~0.5 million scalar (weight) multiplications performed at the same time. Using commercially available optical components and standard neural-network training methods, we demonstrated that optical neural networks can operate near the standard quantum limit with extremely low optical powers and still achieve high accuracy. Our results provide a proof-of-principle for low-optical-power operation, and with careful system design including the surrounding electronics used for data storage and control, open up a path to realizing optical processors that require only 10⁻¹⁶ J total energy per scalar multiplication -- which is orders of magnitude more efficient than current digital processors.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2104.13467")

Code

Syntology Ran 1 of 2 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · fixture could not drive it.

By repository: official repository: 2 samples from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

mcmahon-lab/ONN-QAT-SQL officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report
mcmahon-lab/ONN-device-control officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchCC-BY-4.0 report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

2 samples harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · fixture could not drive it
1unverified

Licence: 2 of the 2 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from mcmahon-lab/ONN-QAT-SQL. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Digitize mcmahon-lab/ONN-QAT-SQL/main_mnist_mlp_QAT.py official repository ran · fixture could not drive it fingerprinted CC-BY-4.0 · pointer only · fab18fbfdf14375c · report
conv1d mcmahon-lab/ONN-QAT-SQL/main_mnist_mlp_QAT.py official repository unverified CC-BY-4.0 · pointer only · dc88ecd8210a7392 · report

Tasks

Medical Image Analysis

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections