Papers › An Operator Splitting Method for Large-Scale CVaR-Constrained Quadratic Programs

An Operator Splitting Method for Large-Scale CVaR-Constrained Quadratic Programs

15 Apr 2025arXiv:2504.10814links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Eric Luxenberg, David Pérez-Piñeiro, Steven Diamond, Stephen Boyd

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

We introduce a fast and scalable method for solving quadratic programs with conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) constraints. While these problems can be formulated as standard quadratic programs, the number of variables and constraints grows linearly with the number of scenarios, making general-purpose solvers impractical for large-scale problems. Our method combines operator splitting with a specialized O(mlogm) algorithm for projecting onto CVaR constraints, where m is the number of scenarios. The method alternates between solving a linear system and performing parallel projections, onto CVaR constraints using our specialized algorithm and onto box constraints by simple clipping. Numerical examples from several application domains demonstrate that our method outperforms general-purpose solvers by several orders of magnitude on problems with up to millions of scenarios. Our method is implemented in an open-source package called CVQP.

PaperPDFCode

Code

cvxgrp/cvqp officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections