Papers › An Open-Source Tool for Longitudinal Whole-Brain and White Matter Lesion Segmentation

An Open-Source Tool for Longitudinal Whole-Brain and White Matter Lesion Segmentation

10 Jul 2022arXiv:2207.04534archive 2025-07-28

Stefano Cerri, Douglas N. Greve, Andrew Hoopes, Henrik Lundell, Hartwig R. Siebner, Mark Mühlau, Koen van Leemput

In this paper we describe and validate a longitudinal method for whole-brain segmentation of longitudinal MRI scans. It builds upon an existing whole-brain segmentation method that can handle multi-contrast data and robustly analyze images with white matter lesions. This method is here extended with subject-specific latent variables that encourage temporal consistency between its segmentation results, enabling it to better track subtle morphological changes in dozens of neuroanatomical structures and white matter lesions. We validate the proposed method on multiple datasets of control subjects and patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease and multiple sclerosis, and compare its results against those obtained with its original cross-sectional formulation and two benchmark longitudinal methods. The results indicate that the method attains a higher test-retest reliability, while being more sensitive to longitudinal disease effect differences between patient groups. An implementation is publicly available as part of the open-source neuroimaging package FreeSurfer.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

3D Medical Imaging SegmentationBrain Image SegmentationBrain Lesion Segmentation From MriBrain SegmentationLesion SegmentationMedical Image SegmentationSegmentation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections