Papers › An Internal Validity Index Based on Density-Involved Distance

An Internal Validity Index Based on Density-Involved Distance

22 Mar 2019archive 2025-07-28

Lianyu Hu, Caiming Zhong

It is crucial to evaluate the quality of clustering results in cluster analysis. Although many cluster validity indices (CVIs) have been proposed in the literature, they have some limitations when dealing with non-spherical datasets. One reason is that the measure of cluster separation does not consider the impact of outliers and neighborhood clusters. In this paper, a new robust distance measure, one into which density is incorporated, is designed to solve the problem, and an internal validity index based on this separation measure is then proposed. This index can cope with both the spherical and non-spherical structure of clusters. The experimental results indicate that the proposed index outperforms some classical CVIs. The MATLAB code and experimental data are available at https://github.com/hulianyu/CVDD

PaperPDFCode

Code

hulianyu/CVDD officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

ClusteringClustering Algorithms EvaluationClustering EnsembleFace ClusteringGraph ClusteringImage/Document ClusteringSpectral Graph Clustering

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Clustering Algorithms Evaluation 97 synthetic datasets CVDD HIT-THE-BEST 50 #1 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Clustering Algorithms Evaluation 97 synthetic datasets CVDD Rank difference 337 #1 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Clustering Algorithms Evaluation JAFFE CVDD Purity 0.977 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Clustering Algorithms Evaluation ionosphere CVDD Purity 0.843 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Clustering Algorithms Evaluation iris CVDD Purity 0.967 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Clustering Algorithms Evaluation pathbased CVDD Purity 0.977 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Clustering Algorithms Evaluation pixraw10P CVDD Purity 0.83 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Clustering Algorithms Evaluation seeds CVDD Purity 0.905 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections