Papers › An integrated Auto Encoder-Block Switching defense approach to prevent adversarial attacks

An integrated Auto Encoder-Block Switching defense approach to prevent adversarial attacks

11 Mar 2022arXiv:2203.10930archive 2025-07-28

Anirudh Yadav, Ashutosh Upadhyay, S. Sharanya

According to recent studies, the vulnerability of state-of-the-art Neural Networks to adversarial input samples has increased drastically. A neural network is an intermediate path or technique by which a computer learns to perform tasks using Machine learning algorithms. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence model has become a fundamental aspect of life, such as self-driving cars [1], smart home devices, so any vulnerability is a significant concern. The smallest input deviations can fool these extremely literal systems and deceive their users as well as administrator into precarious situations. This article proposes a defense algorithm that utilizes the combination of an auto-encoder [3] and block-switching architecture. Auto-coder is intended to remove any perturbations found in input images whereas the block switching method is used to make it more robust against White-box attacks. The attack is planned using FGSM [9] model, and the subsequent counter-attack by the proposed architecture will take place thereby demonstrating the feasibility and security delivered by the algorithm.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Adversarial AttackBIG-bench Machine LearningSelf-Driving Cars

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Adversarial Defense miniImageNet Auto Encoder-Block Switching defense with GradCAM Accuracy 88.54 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections