Papers › An I/O-Efficient Disk-based Graph System for Scalable Second-Order Random Walk of Large Graphs
An I/O-Efficient Disk-based Graph System for Scalable Second-Order Random Walk of Large Graphs
Hongzheng Li, Yingxia Shao, Junping Du, Bin Cui, Lei Chen
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Random walk is widely used in many graph analysis tasks, especially the first-order random walk. However, as a simplification of real-world problems, the first-order random walk is poor at modeling higher-order structures in the data. Recently, second-order random walk-based applications (e.g., Node2vec, Second-order PageRank) have become attractive. Due to the complexity of the second-order random walk models and memory limitations, it is not scalable to run second-order random walk-based applications on a single machine. Existing disk-based graph systems are only friendly to the first-order random walk models and suffer from expensive disk I/Os when executing the second-order random walks. This paper introduces an I/O-efficient disk-based graph system for the scalable second-order random walk of large graphs, called GraSorw. First, to eliminate massive light vertex I/Os, we develop a bi-block execution engine that converts random I/Os into sequential I/Os by applying a new triangular bi-block scheduling strategy, the bucket-based walk management, and the skewed walk storage. Second, to improve the I/O utilization, we design a learning-based block loading model to leverage the advantages of the full-load and on-demand load methods. Finally, we conducted extensive experiments on six large real datasets as well as several synthetic datasets. The empirical results demonstrate that the end-to-end time cost of popular tasks in GraSorw is reduced by more than one order of magnitude compared to the existing disk-based graph systems.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections