Papers › An Extended Validity Domain for Constraint Learning

An Extended Validity Domain for Constraint Learning

14 Jun 2024arXiv:2406.10065links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Yilin Zhu, Samuel Burer

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

We consider embedding a predictive machine-learning model within a prescriptive optimization problem. In this setting, called constraint learning, we study the concept of a validity domain, i.e., a constraint added to the feasible set, which keeps the optimization close to the training data, thus helping to ensure that the computed optimal solution exhibits less prediction error. In particular, we propose a new validity domain which uses a standard convex-hull idea but in an extended space. We investigate its properties and compare it empirically with existing validity domains on a set of test problems for which the ground truth is known. Results show that our extended convex hull routinely outperforms existing validity domains, especially in terms of the function value error, that is, it exhibits closer agreement between the true function value and the predicted function value at the computed optimal solution. We also consider our approach within two stylized optimization models, which show that our method reduces feasibility error, as well as a real-world pricing case study.

PaperPDFCode

Code

yillzhu/extvdom officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections