Papers › An Ensemble of Simple Convolutional Neural Network Models for MNIST Digit Recognition

An Ensemble of Simple Convolutional Neural Network Models for MNIST Digit Recognition

12 Aug 2020arXiv:2008.10400archive 2025-07-28

Sanghyeon An, Minjun Lee, Sanglee Park, Heerin Yang, Jungmin So

We report that a very high accuracy on the MNIST test set can be achieved by using simple convolutional neural network (CNN) models. We use three different models with 3x3, 5x5, and 7x7 kernel size in the convolution layers. Each model consists of a set of convolution layers followed by a single fully connected layer. Every convolution layer uses batch normalization and ReLU activation, and pooling is not used. Rotation and translation is used to augment training data, which is frequently used in most image classification tasks. A majority voting using the three models independently trained on the training data set can achieve up to 99.87% accuracy on the test set, which is one of the state-of-the-art results. A two-layer ensemble, a heterogeneous ensemble of three homogeneous ensemble networks, can achieve up to 99.91% test accuracy. The results can be reproduced by using the code at: https://github.com/ansh941/MnistSimpleCNN

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

ansh941/MnistSimpleCNN officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Image ClassificationTranslationimage-classification

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Batch NormalizationConvolutionReLU

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections