Papers › An Ensemble Approach for Annotating Source Code Identifiers with Part-of-speech Tags

An Ensemble Approach for Annotating Source Code Identifiers with Part-of-speech Tags

1 Sep 2021arXiv:2109.00629archive 2025-07-28

Christian D. Newman, Michael J. Decker, Reem S. AlSuhaibani, Anthony Peruma, Satyajit Mohapatra, Tejal Vishnoi, Marcos Zampieri, Mohamed W. Mkaouer, Timothy J. Sheldon, Emily Hill

This paper presents an ensemble part-of-speech tagging approach for source code identifiers. Ensemble tagging is a technique that uses machine-learning and the output from multiple part-of-speech taggers to annotate natural language text at a higher quality than the part-of-speech taggers are able to obtain independently. Our ensemble uses three state-of-the-art part-of-speech taggers: SWUM, POSSE, and Stanford. We study the quality of the ensemble's annotations on five different types of identifier names: function, class, attribute, parameter, and declaration statement at the level of both individual words and full identifier names. We also study and discuss the weaknesses of our tagger to promote the future amelioration of these problems through further research. Our results show that the ensemble achieves 75% accuracy at the identifier level and 84-86% accuracy at the word level. This is an increase of +17% points at the identifier level from the closest independent part-of-speech tagger.

PaperPDFCode

Code

SCANL/ensemble_tagger officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

AttributePart-Of-Speech Tagging

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

Source Code Tagger Training Set

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections