Papers › An Empirical Comparison of Generative Approaches for Product Attribute-Value Identification

An Empirical Comparison of Generative Approaches for Product Attribute-Value Identification

1 Jul 2024arXiv:2407.01137archive 2025-07-28

Kassem Sabeh, Robert Litschko, Mouna Kacimi, Barbara Plank, Johann Gamper

Product attributes are crucial for e-commerce platforms, supporting applications like search, recommendation, and question answering. The task of Product Attribute and Value Identification (PAVI) involves identifying both attributes and their values from product information. In this paper, we formulate PAVI as a generation task and provide, to the best of our knowledge, the most comprehensive evaluation of PAVI so far. We compare three different attribute-value generation (AVG) strategies based on fine-tuning encoder-decoder models on three datasets. Experiments show that end-to-end AVG approach, which is computationally efficient, outperforms other strategies. However, there are differences depending on model sizes and the underlying language model. The code to reproduce all experiments is available at: https://github.com/kassemsabeh/pavi-avg

PaperPDF

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

AttributeAttribute MiningAttribute Value ExtractionDecoderLanguage ModelingLanguage ModellingQuestion Answering

1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Attribute Mining AE-110k T5 Large - End2End F1-score 84.29 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Attribute Mining MAVE T5 Large - End2End F1-score 95.19 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Attribute Mining OA-Mine - annotations T5 Large - End2End F1-score 86.28 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections