Papers › An Efficient Global Optimality Certificate for Landmark-Based SLAM

An Efficient Global Optimality Certificate for Landmark-Based SLAM

26 Jun 2022arXiv:2206.12961links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Connor Holmes, Timothy D. Barfoot

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Modern state estimation is often formulated as an optimization problem and solved using efficient local search methods. These methods at best guarantee convergence to local minima, but, in some cases, global optimality can also be certified. Although such global optimality certificates have been well established for 3D \textit{pose-graph optimization}, the details have yet to be worked out for the 3D landmark-based SLAM problem, in which estimated states include both robot poses and map landmarks. In this paper, we address this gap by using a graph-theoretic approach to cast the subproblems of landmark-based SLAM into a form that yields a sufficient condition for global optimality. Efficient methods of computing the optimality certificates for these subproblems exist, but first require the construction of a large data matrix. We show that this matrix can be constructed with complexity that remains linear in the number of landmarks and does not exceed the state-of-the-art computational complexity of one local solver iteration. We demonstrate the efficacy of the certificate on simulated and real-world landmark-based SLAM problems. We also integrate our method into the state-of-the-art SE-Sync pipeline to efficiently solve landmark-based SLAM problems to global optimality. Finally, we study the robustness of the global optimality certificate to measurement noise, taking into consideration the effect of the underlying measurement graph.

PaperPDFCode

Code

holmesco/se-sync-landmarks officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections