Papers › An astrophysically motivated ranking criterion for low-latency electromagnetic...

An astrophysically motivated ranking criterion for low-latency electromagnetic follow-up of gravitational wave events

25 Feb 2020arXiv:2002.11214links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

M. Celeste Artale, Yann Bouffanais, Michela Mapelli, Nicola Giacobbo, Nadeen B. Sabha, Filippo Santoliquido, Mario Pasquato, Mario Spera

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

We investigate the properties of the host galaxies of compact binary mergers across cosmic time. To this end, we combine population synthesis simulations together with galaxy catalogues from the hydrodynamical cosmological simulation EAGLE to derive the properties of the host galaxies of binary neutron star (BNS), black hole-neutron star (BHNS) and binary black hole (BBH) mergers. Within this framework, we derive the host galaxy probability, i.e., the probability that a galaxy hosts a compact binary coalescence as a function of its stellar mass, star formation rate, Kₛ magnitude and B magnitude. This quantity is particularly important for low-latency searches of gravitational wave (GW) sources as it provides a way to rank galaxies lying inside the credible region in the sky of a given GW detection, hence reducing the number of viable host candidates. Furthermore, even if no electromagnetic counterpart is detected, the proposed ranking criterion can still be used to classify the galaxies contained in the error box. Our results show that massive galaxies (or equivalently galaxies with a high luminosity in Kₛ band) have a higher probability of hosting BNS, BHNS, and BBH mergers. We provide the probabilities in a suitable format to be implemented in future low-latency searches.

PaperPDFCode

Code

mcartale/HostGalaxyProbability officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections