Papers › An AI-Driven Live Systematic Reviews in the Brain-Heart Interconnectome: Minimizing...
An AI-Driven Live Systematic Reviews in the Brain-Heart Interconnectome: Minimizing Research Waste and Advancing Evidence Synthesis
Arya Rahgozar, Pouria Mortezaagha, Jodi Edwards, Douglas Manuel, Jessie McGowen, Merrick Zwarenstein, Dean Fergusson, Andrea Tricco, Kelly Cobey, Margaret Sampson, Malcolm King, Dawn Richards, Alexandra Bodnaruc, David Moher
The Brain-Heart Interconnectome (BHI) combines neurology and cardiology but is hindered by inefficiencies in evidence synthesis, poor adherence to quality standards, and research waste. To address these challenges, we developed an AI-driven system to enhance systematic reviews in the BHI domain. The system integrates automated detection of Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Study design (PICOS), semantic search using vector embeddings, graph-based querying, and topic modeling to identify redundancies and underexplored areas. Core components include a Bi-LSTM model achieving 87% accuracy for PICOS compliance, a study design classifier with 95.7% accuracy, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with GPT-3.5, which outperformed GPT-4 for graph-based and topic-driven queries. The system provides real-time updates, reducing research waste through a living database and offering an interactive interface with dashboards and conversational AI. While initially developed for BHI, the system's adaptable architecture enables its application across various biomedical fields, supporting rigorous evidence synthesis, efficient resource allocation, and informed clinical decision-making.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections