Papers › An Action Is Worth Multiple Words: Handling Ambiguity in Action Recognition
An Action Is Worth Multiple Words: Handling Ambiguity in Action Recognition
Kiyoon Kim, Davide Moltisanti, Oisin Mac Aodha, Laura Sevilla-Lara
Precisely naming the action depicted in a video can be a challenging and oftentimes ambiguous task. In contrast to object instances represented as nouns (e.g. dog, cat, chair, etc.), in the case of actions, human annotators typically lack a consensus as to what constitutes a specific action (e.g. jogging versus running). In practice, a given video can contain multiple valid positive annotations for the same action. As a result, video datasets often contain significant levels of label noise and overlap between the atomic action classes. In this work, we address the challenge of training multi-label action recognition models from only single positive training labels. We propose two approaches that are based on generating pseudo training examples sampled from similar instances within the train set. Unlike other approaches that use model-derived pseudo-labels, our pseudo-labels come from human annotations and are selected based on feature similarity. To validate our approaches, we create a new evaluation benchmark by manually annotating a subset of EPIC-Kitchens-100's validation set with multiple verb labels. We present results on this new test set along with additional results on a new version of HMDB-51, called Confusing-HMDB-102, where we outperform existing methods in both cases. Data and code are available at https://github.com/kiyoon/verb_ambiguity
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections