Papers › An Achievability Bound for Type-Based Unsourced Multiple Access

An Achievability Bound for Type-Based Unsourced Multiple Access

28 Apr 2025arXiv:2504.19916links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Deekshith Pathayappilly Krishnan, Kaan Okumus, Khac-Hoang Ngo, Giuseppe Durisi

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

We derive an achievability bound to quantify the performance of a type-based unsourced multiple access system -- an information-theoretic model for grant-free multiple access with correlated messages. The bound extends available achievability results for the per-user error probability in the unsourced multiple access framework, where, different from our setup, message collisions are treated as errors. Specifically, we provide an upper bound on the total variation distance between the type (i.e., the empirical probability mass function) of the transmitted messages and its estimate over a Gaussian multiple access channel. Through numerical simulations, we illustrate that our bound can be used to determine the message type that is less efficient to transmit, because more difficult to detect. We finally show that a practical scheme for type estimation, based on coded compressed sensing with approximate message passing, operates approximately 3 dB away from the bound, for the parameters considered in the paper.

PaperPDFCode

Code

deekshithpk/tuma-bound officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections