Papers › AMOR: A Recipe for Building Adaptable Modular Knowledge Agents Through Process Feedback
AMOR: A Recipe for Building Adaptable Modular Knowledge Agents Through Process Feedback
Jian Guan, Wei Wu, Zujie Wen, Peng Xu, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
The notable success of large language models (LLMs) has sparked an upsurge in building language agents to complete various complex tasks. We present AMOR, an agent framework based on open-source LLMs, which reasons with external knowledge bases and adapts to specific domains through human supervision to the reasoning process. AMOR builds reasoning logic over a finite state machine (FSM) that solves problems through autonomous executions and transitions over disentangled modules. This allows humans to provide direct feedback to the individual modules, and thus naturally forms process supervision. Based on this reasoning and feedback framework, we develop AMOR through two-stage fine-tuning: warm-up and adaptation. The former fine-tunes the LLM with examples automatically constructed from various public datasets, enabling AMOR to generalize across different knowledge environments, while the latter tailors AMOR to specific domains using process feedback. Extensive experiments across multiple domains demonstrate the advantage of AMOR to strong baselines, thanks to its FSM-based reasoning and process feedback mechanism. The code and data are publicly available at \url{https://github.com/JianGuanTHU/AMOR}.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2402.01469")
Code
Syntology Ran 19 of 24 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 5 ran · our draft was wrong; 3 ran · fixture could not drive it; 11 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 23 samples from 1 repository, 18 ran; 1 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
24 samples harvested; 19 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 24 of the 24 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from JianGuanTHU/AMOR. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
30d7eec482ebf6b1 · report
3dbe593f2d6f3b4e · report
6bfe6fa28a5de901 · report
572dde6105d00036 · report
06c2cf625cad2b53 · report
8e8d8d9e109e9f1e · report
50ff7976d78544ac · report
88c615c48b7dd37b · report
5fc26624516c1588 · report
f725bc2d76076485 · report
99e4a58eb23854c4 · report
bd4037a865476156 · report
229b36214feed61d · report
fe65d70569706d67 · report
5b8b14beaf8deb74 · report
76fe6fab3919e7d6 · report
b99eea6376d1e212 · report
8fd91ae45180bf3e · report
3df7b70913f4ced7 · report
358cf499b8ba9ff5 · report
04e5aaed2ab55a45 · report
e1590868abc435b3 · report
0b69caf4cf9368d9 · report
9a65a30d006fc96e · report
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections