Papers › AlphaNet: Improved Training of Supernets with Alpha-Divergence

AlphaNet: Improved Training of Supernets with Alpha-Divergence

16 Feb 2021arXiv:2102.07954archive 2025-07-28

Dilin Wang, Chengyue Gong, Meng Li, Qiang Liu, Vikas Chandra

Weight-sharing neural architecture search (NAS) is an effective technique for automating efficient neural architecture design. Weight-sharing NAS builds a supernet that assembles all the architectures as its sub-networks and jointly trains the supernet with the sub-networks. The success of weight-sharing NAS heavily relies on distilling the knowledge of the supernet to the sub-networks. However, we find that the widely used distillation divergence, i.e., KL divergence, may lead to student sub-networks that over-estimate or under-estimate the uncertainty of the teacher supernet, leading to inferior performance of the sub-networks. In this work, we propose to improve the supernet training with a more generalized alpha-divergence. By adaptively selecting the alpha-divergence, we simultaneously prevent the over-estimation or under-estimation of the uncertainty of the teacher model. We apply the proposed alpha-divergence based supernets training to both slimmable neural networks and weight-sharing NAS, and demonstrate significant improvements. Specifically, our discovered model family, AlphaNet, outperforms prior-art models on a wide range of FLOPs regimes, including BigNAS, Once-for-All networks, and AttentiveNAS. We achieve ImageNet top-1 accuracy of 80.0% with only 444M FLOPs. Our code and pretrained models are available at https://github.com/facebookresearch/AlphaNet.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2102.07954")

Code

Syntology Ran 16 of 31 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 15 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 4 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran · fixture could not drive it; 9 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran; named in the paper: 29 samples from 1 repository, 14 ran; 1 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

facebookresearch/AlphaNet officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report
facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS mentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

31 samples harvested; 16 ran; 4 honoured the contract we drafted; 15 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

4ran · honoured contract
1ran · our draft was wrong
2ran · fixture could not drive it
9ran
15unverified

Licence: 31 of the 31 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

f_divergence facebookresearch/AlphaNet/loss_ops.py official repository ran · fixture could not drive it fingerprinted licence not identified · pointer only · bd606208d8003d1e · report
ConvBnActLayer facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper ran fingerprinted licence not identified · pointer only · a7e70ce25e3ac2a4 · report
DynamicBatchNorm2d facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper ran licence not identified · pointer only · a0efb5eabd43bfb3 · report
DynamicLinear facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper ran · metamorphic tier: invariant fingerprinted licence not identified · pointer only · 86a56f5a600b5419 · report
DynamicLinearLayer facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper ran fingerprinted licence not identified · pointer only · 94f0bda6ed5a2e9d · report
DynamicPointConv2d facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper ran · metamorphic tier: invariant fingerprinted licence not identified · pointer only · df25f4eefb96b548 · report
IdentityLayer facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper ran · metamorphic tier: invariant fingerprinted licence not identified · pointer only · 0257146dc3978be2 · report
LinearLayer facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper ran · metamorphic tier: invariant licence not identified · pointer only · c3abc01ffd8662f7 · report
ShortcutLayer facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper ran · metamorphic tier: invariant fingerprinted licence not identified · pointer only · 1c4df2c55cd70330 · report
build_activation facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper ran licence not identified · pointer only · 6150fe6395eb4ee3 · report
drop_connect facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper ran · fixture could not drive it licence not identified · pointer only · 6053cb1369b46c73 · report
get_net_device facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper ran · our draft was wrong licence not identified · pointer only · 0e1ee8a546f09486 · report
get_same_padding facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper ran · honoured contract fingerprinted licence not identified · pointer only · 71cbea6f98bde1f9 · report
int2list facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper ran · honoured contract fingerprinted licence not identified · pointer only · 35ee83149f0affc7 · report
sub_filter_start_end facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper ran · honoured contract fingerprinted licence not identified · pointer only · 00fdaefcd3c7d435 · report
AllReduce facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper unverified licence not identified · pointer only · 0b4bd61096ddb694 · report
AttentiveNasDynamicModel facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper unverified licence not identified · pointer only · 06d08882ecf1c68a · report
AttentiveNasStaticModel facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper unverified licence not identified · pointer only · 8ff71dfd928cae27 · report
DynamicConvBnActLayer facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper unverified licence not identified · pointer only · 39b14fb632110a3f · report
DynamicMBConvLayer facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper unverified licence not identified · pointer only · c582a9fdd53c2f23 · report
DynamicSE facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper unverified licence not identified · pointer only · 4c386a2f1dbb59bd · report
DynamicSeparableConv2d facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper unverified licence not identified · pointer only · 7949f6e86881267d · report
DynamicShortcutLayer facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper unverified licence not identified · pointer only · bb02270a794b549e · report
MBInvertedConvLayer facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper unverified licence not identified · pointer only · 1305fda939e9811f · report
MobileInvertedResidualBlock facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper unverified licence not identified · pointer only · d7620e552fd063af · report
MyModule facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper unverified licence not identified · pointer only · 6669bff300b9aa8f · report
MyNetwork facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper unverified licence not identified · pointer only · f6b0ce7520ccf192 · report
SELayer facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper unverified licence not identified · pointer only · a8a91d970372f10e · report
copy_bn facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper unverified licence not identified · pointer only · 551a6373b2274b70 · report
set_layer_from_config facebookresearch/AttentiveNAS/models/attentive_nas_dynamic_model.py named in the paper unverified licence not identified · pointer only · 102325b4dff7f585 · report
make_divisible identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · honoured contract fingerprinted licence of this copy not recorded · 3356d3566f053dcc · report

Tasks

Image ClassificationNeural Architecture Search

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Classification ImageNet AlphaNet-A6 GFLOPs 0.709 #678 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet AlphaNet-A6 Top 1 Accuracy 80.8% #678 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet AlphaNet-A5 GFLOPs 0.491 #707 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet AlphaNet-A5 Top 1 Accuracy 80.3% #707 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet AlphaNet-A4 GFLOPs 0.444 #724 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet AlphaNet-A4 Top 1 Accuracy 80.0% #724 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet AlphaNet-A3 GFLOPs 0.357 #754 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet AlphaNet-A3 Top 1 Accuracy 79.4% #754 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet AlphaNet-A2 GFLOPs 0.317 #774 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet AlphaNet-A2 Top 1 Accuracy 79.1% #774 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet AlphaNet-A1 GFLOPs 0.279 #799 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet AlphaNet-A1 Top 1 Accuracy 78.9% #799 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet AlphaNet-A0 GFLOPs 0.203 #862 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet AlphaNet-A0 Top 1 Accuracy 77.8% #862 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A6 Accuracy 80.8 #12 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A6 FLOPs 709M #12 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A6 Top-1 Error Rate 19.2 #12 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A5 (base) Accuracy 80.6 #14 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A5 (base) FLOPs 596M #14 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A5 (base) Top-1 Error Rate 19.4 #14 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A5 (small) Accuracy 80.3 #19 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A5 (small) FLOPs 491M #19 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A5 (small) Top-1 Error Rate 19.7 #19 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A4 Accuracy 80.0 #23 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A4 FLOPs 444M #23 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A4 Top-1 Error Rate 20.0 #23 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A3 Accuracy 79.4 #33 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A3 FLOPs 357M #33 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A3 Top-1 Error Rate 20.6 #33 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A2 Accuracy 79.2 #34 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A2 FLOPs 317M #34 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A2 Top-1 Error Rate 20.8 #34 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A1 Accuracy 79.0 #37 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A1 FLOPs 279M #37 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A1 Top-1 Error Rate 21.0 #37 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A0 Accuracy 77.9 #55 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A0 FLOPs 203M #55 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet AlphaNet-A0 Top-1 Error Rate 22.1 #55 of 135 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections