Papers › Aligned to the Object, not to the Image: A Unified Pose-aligned Representation for...
Aligned to the Object, not to the Image: A Unified Pose-aligned Representation for Fine-grained Recognition
Pei Guo, Ryan Farrell
Dramatic appearance variation due to pose constitutes a great challenge in fine-grained recognition, one which recent methods using attention mechanisms or second-order statistics fail to adequately address. Modern CNNs typically lack an explicit understanding of object pose and are instead confused by entangled pose and appearance. In this paper, we propose a unified object representation built from a hierarchy of pose-aligned regions. Rather than representing an object by regions aligned to image axes, the proposed representation characterizes appearance relative to the object's pose using pose-aligned patches whose features are robust to variations in pose, scale and rotation. We propose an algorithm that performs pose estimation and forms the unified object representation as the concatenation of hierarchical pose-aligned regions features, which is then fed into a classification network. The proposed algorithm surpasses the performance of other approaches, increasing the state-of-the-art by nearly 2% on the widely-used CUB-200 dataset and by more than 8% on the much larger NABirds dataset. The effectiveness of this paradigm relative to competing methods suggests the critical importance of disentangling pose and appearance for continued progress in fine-grained recognition.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fine-Grained Image Classification | NABirds | PAIRS | Accuracy | 87.9% | #25 of 30 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections