Papers › Algorithmic Factors Influencing Bias in Machine Learning

Algorithmic Factors Influencing Bias in Machine Learning

28 Apr 2021arXiv:2104.14014archive 2025-07-28

William Blanzeisky, Pádraig Cunningham

It is fair to say that many of the prominent examples of bias in Machine Learning (ML) arise from bias that is there in the training data. In fact, some would argue that supervised ML algorithms cannot be biased, they reflect the data on which they are trained. In this paper we demonstrate how ML algorithms can misrepresent the training data through underestimation. We show how irreducible error, regularization and feature and class imbalance can contribute to this underestimation. The paper concludes with a demonstration of how the careful management of synthetic counterfactuals can ameliorate the impact of this underestimation bias.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.

Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

BIG-bench Machine LearningManagement

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Counterfactuals

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections