Papers › AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating...

AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Bias

3 Oct 2018arXiv:1810.01943archive 2025-07-28

Rachel K. E. Bellamy, Kuntal Dey, Michael Hind, Samuel C. Hoffman, Stephanie Houde, Kalapriya Kannan, Pranay Lohia, Jacquelyn Martino, Sameep Mehta, Aleksandra Mojsilovic, Seema Nagar, Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, John Richards, Diptikalyan Saha, Prasanna Sattigeri, Moninder Singh, Kush R. Varshney, Yunfeng Zhang

Fairness is an increasingly important concern as machine learning models are used to support decision making in high-stakes applications such as mortgage lending, hiring, and prison sentencing. This paper introduces a new open source Python toolkit for algorithmic fairness, AI Fairness 360 (AIF360), released under an Apache v2.0 license {https://github.com/ibm/aif360). The main objectives of this toolkit are to help facilitate the transition of fairness research algorithms to use in an industrial setting and to provide a common framework for fairness researchers to share and evaluate algorithms. The package includes a comprehensive set of fairness metrics for datasets and models, explanations for these metrics, and algorithms to mitigate bias in datasets and models. It also includes an interactive Web experience (https://aif360.mybluemix.net) that provides a gentle introduction to the concepts and capabilities for line-of-business users, as well as extensive documentation, usage guidance, and industry-specific tutorials to enable data scientists and practitioners to incorporate the most appropriate tool for their problem into their work products. The architecture of the package has been engineered to conform to a standard paradigm used in data science, thereby further improving usability for practitioners. Such architectural design and abstractions enable researchers and developers to extend the toolkit with their new algorithms and improvements, and to use it for performance benchmarking. A built-in testing infrastructure maintains code quality.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1810.01943")

Code

Syntology Ran 3 of 11 code samples harvested from 4 repositories linked to this paper; 8 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: official repository: 4 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran; community (archive-listed): 7 samples from 3 repositories, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

13 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.

IBM/AIF360 officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubtfApache-2.0 report
DaveFClarke/ml_bias_checking mentioned on GitHubtfApache-2.0 report
aradhanacha/aif360 mentioned on GitHubtfApache-2.0 report
bspanjers/AIFBAREND mentioned on GitHubtfApache-2.0 report
chenzhenpeng18/fse22-maat mentioned on GitHubtfNOASSERTION report
elsalmi/LendingClub mentioned on GitHub report
gitforreview/dsaa_journal_review mentioned on GitHubMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

11 samples harvested; 3 ran; 2 honoured the contract we drafted; 8 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran · honoured contract
1ran · our draft was wrong
8unverified

Licence: 1 of the 11 samples is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 4 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

do_decorate IBM/AIF360/aif360/decorating_metaclass.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 289eb0c6849d3227 · report
dont_decorate IBM/AIF360/aif360/decorating_metaclass.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 01ea0d2b717db869 · report
factory IBM/AIF360/aif360/decorating_metaclass.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · def3932f5d378389 · report
weighted_cost IBM/AIF360/aif360/algorithms/postprocessing/calibrated_eq_odds_postprocessing.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 1e900bae8b2c9e29 · report
default_preprocessing datalab-georgetown/fairness-and-missing-values/MAR_compas.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · eede2c40a6ec49b1 · report
get_distortion_adult datalab-georgetown/fairness-and-missing-values/MNAR_adult.py community (archive-listed) ran · honoured contract MIT (permissive) · 3121e31a3851b066 · report
get_distortion_compas datalab-georgetown/fairness-and-missing-values/MAR_compas.py community (archive-listed) ran · honoured contract MIT (permissive) · 2c079b2e82f2279d · report
get_distortion_syn gitforreview/dsaa_journal_review/MNAR_syn.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 1533d1dc758fbfbb · report
quantizeLOS gitforreview/dsaa_journal_review/MNAR_syn.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 557b4e0443b49c81 · report
quantizePrior1 gitforreview/dsaa_journal_review/MNAR_syn.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · ede92860076c393d · report
weighted_cost DaveFClarke/ml_bias_checking/aif360/algorithms/postprocessing/calibrated_eq_odds_postprocessing.py community (archive-listed) unverified Apache-2.0 recorded; this copy not marked cleared · pointer only · 7fb981da51078eff · report

Tasks

BenchmarkingDecision MakingFairness

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections