Papers › Adversary Resilient Learned Bloom Filters
Adversary Resilient Learned Bloom Filters
Ghada Almashaqbeh, Allison Bishop, Hayder Tirmazi
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
A learned Bloom filter (LBF) combines a classical Bloom filter (CBF) with a learning model to reduce the amount of memory needed to represent a given set while achieving a target false positive rate (FPR). Provable security against adaptive adversaries that advertently attempt to increase FPR has been studied for CBFs, but not for LBFs. In this paper, we close this gap and show how to achieve adaptive security for LBFs. In particular, we define several adaptive security notions capturing varying degrees of adversarial control, including full and partial adaptivity, in addition to LBF extensions of existing adversarial models for CBFs, including the Always-Bet and Bet-or-Pass notions. We propose two secure LBF constructions, PRP-LBF and Cuckoo-LBF, and formally prove their security under these models assuming the existence of one-way functions. Based on our analysis and use case evaluations, our constructions achieve strong security guarantees while maintaining competitive FPR and memory overhead.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections