Papers › Admission Prediction in Undergraduate Applications: an Interpretable Deep Learning Approach
Admission Prediction in Undergraduate Applications: an Interpretable Deep Learning Approach
Amisha Priyadarshini, Barbara Martinez-Neda, Sergio Gago-Masague
This article addresses the challenge of validating the admission committee's decisions for undergraduate admissions. In recent years, the traditional review process has struggled to handle the overwhelmingly large amount of applicants' data. Moreover, this traditional assessment often leads to human bias, which might result in discrimination among applicants. Although classical machine learning-based approaches exist that aim to verify the quantitative assessment made by the application reviewers, these methods lack scalability and suffer from performance issues when a large volume of data is in place. In this context, we propose deep learning-based classifiers, namely Feed-Forward and Input Convex neural networks, which overcome the challenges faced by the existing methods. Furthermore, we give additional insights into our model by incorporating an interpretability module, namely LIME. Our training and test datasets comprise applicants' data with a wide range of variables and information. Our models achieve higher accuracy compared to the best-performing traditional machine learning-based approach by a considerable margin of 3.03\%. Additionally, we show the sensitivity of different features and their relative impacts on the overall admission decision using the LIME technique.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections