Papers › Do We Need Anisotropic Graph Neural Networks?
Do We Need Anisotropic Graph Neural Networks?
Shyam A. Tailor, Felix L. Opolka, Pietro Liò, Nicholas D. Lane
Common wisdom in the graph neural network (GNN) community dictates that anisotropic models -- in which messages sent between nodes are a function of both the source and target node -- are required to achieve state-of-the-art performance. Benchmarks to date have demonstrated that these models perform better than comparable isotropic models -- where messages are a function of the source node only. In this work we provide empirical evidence challenging this narrative: we propose an isotropic GNN, which we call Efficient Graph Convolution (EGC), that consistently outperforms comparable anisotropic models, including the popular GAT or PNA architectures by using spatially-varying adaptive filters. In addition to raising important questions for the GNN community, our work has significant real-world implications for efficiency. EGC achieves higher model accuracy, with lower memory consumption and latency, along with characteristics suited to accelerator implementation, while being a drop-in replacement for existing architectures. As an isotropic model, it requires memory proportional to the number of vertices in the graph (𝒪(V)); in contrast, anisotropic models require memory proportional to the number of edges (𝒪(E)). We demonstrate that EGC outperforms existing approaches across 6 large and diverse benchmark datasets, and conclude by discussing questions that our work raise for the community going forward. Code and pretrained models for our experiments are provided at https://github.com/shyam196/egc.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-code2 | EGC-M (No Edge Features) | Ext. data | No | #12 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-code2 | EGC-M (No Edge Features) | Number of params | 10986002 | #12 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-code2 | EGC-M (No Edge Features) | Test F1 score | 0.1595 ± 0.0019 | #12 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-code2 | EGC-M (No Edge Features) | Validation F1 score | 0.1464 ± 0.0021 | #12 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-code2 | PNA (No Edge Features) | Ext. data | No | #15 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-code2 | PNA (No Edge Features) | Number of params | 10992050 | #15 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-code2 | PNA (No Edge Features) | Test F1 score | 0.1570 ± 0.0032 | #15 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-code2 | PNA (No Edge Features) | Validation F1 score | 0.1453 ± 0.0025 | #15 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-code2 | MPNN-Max (No Edge Features) | Ext. data | No | #17 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-code2 | MPNN-Max (No Edge Features) | Number of params | 10971506 | #17 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-code2 | MPNN-Max (No Edge Features) | Test F1 score | 0.1552 ± 0.0022 | #17 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-code2 | MPNN-Max (No Edge Features) | Validation F1 score | 0.1441 ± 0.0016 | #17 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-code2 | EGC-S (No Edge Features) | Ext. data | No | #18 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-code2 | EGC-S (No Edge Features) | Number of params | 11156530 | #18 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-code2 | EGC-S (No Edge Features) | Test F1 score | 0.1528 ± 0.0025 | #18 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-code2 | EGC-S (No Edge Features) | Validation F1 score | 0.1427 ± 0.0020 | #18 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-molhiv | EGC-M (No Edge Features) | Ext. data | No | #32 of 43 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-molhiv | EGC-M (No Edge Features) | Number of params | 317265 | #32 of 43 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-molhiv | EGC-M (No Edge Features) | Test ROC-AUC | 0.7818 ± 0.0153 | #32 of 43 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-molhiv | EGC-M (No Edge Features) | Validation ROC-AUC | 0.8396 ± 0.0097 | #32 of 43 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-molhiv | EGC-S (No Edge Features) | Ext. data | No | #36 of 43 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-molhiv | EGC-S (No Edge Features) | Number of params | 317013 | #36 of 43 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-molhiv | EGC-S (No Edge Features) | Test ROC-AUC | 0.7721 ± 0.0110 | #36 of 43 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Graph Property Prediction | ogbg-molhiv | EGC-S (No Edge Features) | Validation ROC-AUC | 0.8366 ± 0.0074 | #36 of 43 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Node Property Prediction | ogbn-arxiv | EGC-S (100k) | Ext. data | No | #65 of 86 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Node Property Prediction | ogbn-arxiv | EGC-S (100k) | Number of params | 100648 | #65 of 86 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Node Property Prediction | ogbn-arxiv | EGC-S (100k) | Test Accuracy | 0.7219 ± 0.0016 | #65 of 86 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Node Property Prediction | ogbn-arxiv | EGC-S (100k) | Validation Accuracy | 0.7338 ± 0.0022 | #65 of 86 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Node Property Prediction | ogbn-arxiv | EGC-M (100k) | Ext. data | No | #71 of 86 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Node Property Prediction | ogbn-arxiv | EGC-M (100k) | Number of params | 99464 | #71 of 86 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Node Property Prediction | ogbn-arxiv | EGC-M (100k) | Test Accuracy | 0.7196 ± 0.0023 | #71 of 86 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Node Property Prediction | ogbn-arxiv | EGC-M (100k) | Validation Accuracy | 0.7334 ± 0.0013 | #71 of 86 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections