Papers › Adaptive Chameleon or Stubborn Sloth: Revealing the Behavior of Large Language Models...

Adaptive Chameleon or Stubborn Sloth: Revealing the Behavior of Large Language Models in Knowledge Conflicts

22 May 2023arXiv:2305.13300archive 2025-07-28

Jian Xie, Kai Zhang, Jiangjie Chen, Renze Lou, Yu Su

By providing external information to large language models (LLMs), tool augmentation (including retrieval augmentation) has emerged as a promising solution for addressing the limitations of LLMs' static parametric memory. However, how receptive are LLMs to such external evidence, especially when the evidence conflicts with their parametric memory? We present the first comprehensive and controlled investigation into the behavior of LLMs when encountering knowledge conflicts. We propose a systematic framework to elicit high-quality parametric memory from LLMs and construct the corresponding counter-memory, which enables us to conduct a series of controlled experiments. Our investigation reveals seemingly contradicting behaviors of LLMs. On the one hand, different from prior wisdom, we find that LLMs can be highly receptive to external evidence even when that conflicts with their parametric memory, given that the external evidence is coherent and convincing. On the other hand, LLMs also demonstrate a strong confirmation bias when the external evidence contains some information that is consistent with their parametric memory, despite being presented with conflicting evidence at the same time. These results pose important implications that are worth careful consideration for the further development and deployment of tool- and retrieval-augmented LLMs. Resources are available at https://github.com/OSU-NLP-Group/LLM-Knowledge-Conflict.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2305.13300")

Code

Syntology Ran 7 of 10 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 3 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran · our draft was wrong; 4 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 7 samples from 1 repository, 6 ran; community (archive-listed): 3 samples from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

osu-nlp-group/llm-knowledge-conflict officialmentioned in paperApache-2.0 report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

10 samples harvested; 7 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

3ran · our draft was wrong
4ran
3unverified

Licence: 3 of the 10 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

build_claim_popQA osu-nlp-group/llm-knowledge-conflict/code/prompt_preparation.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 367590f6d8914402 · report
build_zeroshot_prompt_popQA_with_singleSource_evidence osu-nlp-group/llm-knowledge-conflict/code/prompt_preparation.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong Apache-2.0 (permissive) · db391e5200411c40 · report
calc_cost_w_tokens OSU-NLP-Group/LLM-Knowledge-Conflict/code/openai_request.py official repository ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 3589cdef8c72142f · report
limited_execution_time OSU-NLP-Group/LLM-Knowledge-Conflict/code/openai_request.py official repository ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · f5009f2a6258e5e8 · report
load_line_json_data OSU-NLP-Group/LLM-Knowledge-Conflict/code/prompt_preparation.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 959eef29433a0a23 · report
openai_unit_price OSU-NLP-Group/LLM-Knowledge-Conflict/code/openai_request.py official repository ran fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · db2cf6f145458dbc · report
build_zeroshot_prompt_popQA OSU-NLP-Group/LLM-Knowledge-Conflict/code/prompt_preparation.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 241d7275ea43ae59 · report
get_prompt copenlu/context-utilisation-for-rag/src/get_model_predictions/get_model_predictions.py community (archive-listed) ran GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · 525dbdd48bc6f54c · report
TextWithLogitsGenerationPipeline copenlu/context-utilisation-for-rag/src/get_model_predictions/get_model_predictions.py community (archive-listed) unverified GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · 56a4bdd3f8d69984 · report
predict_veracity copenlu/context-utilisation-for-rag/src/get_model_predictions/get_model_predictions.py community (archive-listed) unverified GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · 56c7a4ff3e95f3a9 · report

Tasks

Retrieval

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections