Papers › AdaBrowse: Adaptive Video Browser for Efficient Continuous Sign Language Recognition
AdaBrowse: Adaptive Video Browser for Efficient Continuous Sign Language Recognition
Lianyu Hu, Liqing Gao, Zekang Liu, Chi-Man Pun, Wei Feng
Raw videos have been proven to own considerable feature redundancy where in many cases only a portion of frames can already meet the requirements for accurate recognition. In this paper, we are interested in whether such redundancy can be effectively leveraged to facilitate efficient inference in continuous sign language recognition (CSLR). We propose a novel adaptive model (AdaBrowse) to dynamically select a most informative subsequence from input video sequences by modelling this problem as a sequential decision task. In specific, we first utilize a lightweight network to quickly scan input videos to extract coarse features. Then these features are fed into a policy network to intelligently select a subsequence to process. The corresponding subsequence is finally inferred by a normal CSLR model for sentence prediction. As only a portion of frames are processed in this procedure, the total computations can be considerably saved. Besides temporal redundancy, we are also interested in whether the inherent spatial redundancy can be seamlessly integrated together to achieve further efficiency, i.e., dynamically selecting a lowest input resolution for each sample, whose model is referred to as AdaBrowse+. Extensive experimental results on four large-scale CSLR datasets, i.e., PHOENIX14, PHOENIX14-T, CSL-Daily and CSL, demonstrate the effectiveness of AdaBrowse and AdaBrowse+ by achieving comparable accuracy with state-of-the-art methods with 1.44× throughput and 2.12× fewer FLOPs. Comparisons with other commonly-used 2D CNNs and adaptive efficient methods verify the effectiveness of AdaBrowse. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/hulianyuyy/AdaBrowse}.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2308.08327")
Code
Syntology Ran 2 of 3 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 3 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
3 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 3 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from hulianyuyy/adabrowse. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
583f9780bdd00a45 · report
58b8fe3202ad7d23 · report
15e5ae9656ce1430 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sign Language Recognition | CSL-Daily | AdaBrowse | Word Error Rate (WER) | 30.6 | #11 of 14 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections