Papers › ACTISM: Threat-informed Dynamic Security Modelling for Automotive Systems
ACTISM: Threat-informed Dynamic Security Modelling for Automotive Systems
Shaofei Huang, Christopher M. Poskitt, Lwin Khin Shar
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Evolving cybersecurity threats in complex cyber-physical systems pose significant risks to system functionality and safety. This experience report introduces ACTISM (Automotive Consequence-Driven and Threat-Informed Security Modelling), an integrated security modelling framework that enhances the resilience of automotive systems by dynamically updating their cybersecurity posture in response to prevailing and evolving threats, attacker tactics, and their impact on system functionality and safety. ACTISM addresses the existing knowledge gap in static security assessment methodologies by providing a dynamic and iterative framework. We demonstrate the effectiveness of ACTISM by applying it to a real-world example of the Tesla Electric Vehicle's In-Vehicle Infotainment system, illustrating how the security model can be adapted as new threats emerge. We also report the results of a practitioners' survey on the usefulness of ACTISM and its future directions. The survey highlights avenues for future research and development in this area, including automated vulnerability management workflows for automotive systems.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections