Papers › Actional-Structural Graph Convolutional Networks for Skeleton-based Action Recognition
Actional-Structural Graph Convolutional Networks for Skeleton-based Action Recognition
Maosen Li, Siheng Chen, Xu Chen, Ya zhang, Yan-Feng Wang, Qi Tian
Action recognition with skeleton data has recently attracted much attention in computer vision. Previous studies are mostly based on fixed skeleton graphs, only capturing local physical dependencies among joints, which may miss implicit joint correlations. To capture richer dependencies, we introduce an encoder-decoder structure, called A-link inference module, to capture action-specific latent dependencies, i.e. actional links, directly from actions. We also extend the existing skeleton graphs to represent higher-order dependencies, i.e. structural links. Combing the two types of links into a generalized skeleton graph, we further propose the actional-structural graph convolution network (AS-GCN), which stacks actional-structural graph convolution and temporal convolution as a basic building block, to learn both spatial and temporal features for action recognition. A future pose prediction head is added in parallel to the recognition head to help capture more detailed action patterns through self-supervision. We validate AS-GCN in action recognition using two skeleton data sets, NTU-RGB+D and Kinetics. The proposed AS-GCN achieves consistently large improvement compared to the state-of-the-art methods. As a side product, AS-GCN also shows promising results for future pose prediction.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1904.12659")
Code
Syntology Ran 7 of 18 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 11 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · violated contract; 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 18 samples from 1 repository, 7 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
18 samples harvested; 7 ran; 2 honoured the contract we drafted; 11 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 18 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from limaosen0/AS-GCN. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
8b14974e8aa7320f · report
c257ac36cba643a2 · report
47a234b123ed6809 · report
8158f4435afa26b7 · report
f3dfe2628c96a73d · report
c6381bb48f81a144 · report
7e6ab20b3ba9e367 · report
e1e2226c2351db43 · report
6a33418ef40d3c11 · report
5fa7f74d4634a729 · report
99297212116c8e48 · report
588710fb10212034 · report
8c9b61ef46b62157 · report
9310c1921882d972 · report
6d75c1704d3163ea · report
005986a60686cb80 · report
2f7f389f0584c97e · report
b43e0bf3e224c756 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skeleton Based Action Recognition | Kinetics-Skeleton dataset | AS-GCN | Accuracy | 34.8 | #21 of 42 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Skeleton Based Action Recognition | NTU RGB+D | AS-GCN | Accuracy (CS) | 86.8 | #79 of 135 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Skeleton Based Action Recognition | NTU RGB+D | AS-GCN | Accuracy (CV) | 94.2 | #79 of 135 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections