Papers › Accumulation of individual fitness or wealth as a population game

Accumulation of individual fitness or wealth as a population game

4 Jul 2017arXiv:1707.00996links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Sylvain Gibaud, Jorgen W. Weibull

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

The accumulation of individual fitness or wealth is modelled as a population game in which pairs of individuals are recurrently and randomly matched to play a game over a resource. In addition, all individuals have random access to a constant background resource, and their fitness or wealth depreciates over time. For brevity we focus on the well-known Hawk-Dove game. In the base-line model, the probability of winning a fight (that is, when both play Hawk) is the same for both parties. In an extended version, the individual with higher current fitness or wealth has a higher probability of winning. Analytical results are given for the fitness/wealth distribution at any given time, for the evolution of average fitness/wealth over time, and for the asymptotics with respect to time and population size. Long-run average fitness/wealth is non-monotonic in the value of the resource, thus providing a potential explanation of the curse of the riches.

PaperPDFCode

Code

ProfesseurGibaud/Model-of-wealth-Accumulation officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections