Papers › Accelerated RRT* By Local Directional Visibility

Accelerated RRT* By Local Directional Visibility

17 Jul 2022arXiv:2207.08283links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Chenxi Feng, Haochen Wu

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

RRT* is an efficient sampling-based motion planning algorithm. However, without taking advantages of accessible environment information, sampling-based algorithms usually result in sampling failures, generate useless nodes, and/or fail in exploring narrow passages. For this paper, in order to better utilize environment information and further improve searching efficiency, we proposed a novel approach to improve RRT* by 1) quantifying local knowledge of the obstacle configurations during neighbour rewiring in terms of directional visibility, 2) collecting environment information during searching, and 3) changing the sampling strategy biasing toward near-obstacle nodes after the first solution found. The proposed algorithm RRT* by Local Directional Visibility (RRT*-LDV) better utilizes local known information and innovates a weighted sampling strategy. The accelerated RRT*-LDV outperforms RRT* in convergence rate and success rate of finding narrow passages. A high Degree-Of-Freedom scenario is also experimented.

PaperPDFCode

Code

chenaaron0917/rrtstar-ldv officialmentioned in paper report
hcaawu/rrtstar-ldv officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections